JUDGING CRITERIA

Comprehension and Content

Has the presentation provided an interpretation of the scope of the research topic which includes the background and its significance, thus describing terminology and avoiding jargon?
Did the presentation explain precisely the impact and/or implications of the research, including findings and results?
Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
Was the thesis topic, research significance, results/impact and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
Have the presenter spent enough time in each element of their presentation – or have they been working on one feature for too long, or has the presentation rushed?

Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
Was the presenter careful not to trivialise or generalise their research?
Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience’s attention?
Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?
Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation – was it clear, legible, and concise?

Disclaimer: The organizer’s judgment is final and no complaint or appeal in all means will be entertained.